<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 83 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, unsustainable. The appellant had paid the service tax and interest before the Show Cause Notice was issued, demonstrating no intention to evade tax. Citing precedents and lack of suspicion of fraudulent behavior, the Tribunal concluded the penalty was unjustified and set it aside, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:26:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 83 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, unsustainable. The appellant had paid the service tax and interest before the Show Cause Notice was issued, demonstrating no intention to evade tax. Citing precedents and lack of suspicion of fraudulent behavior, the Tribunal concluded the penalty was unjustified and set it aside, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>