<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 72 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16620</link>
    <description>The High Court concluded that the new theatre was an expansion of the existing business, and the interest paid on borrowed funds for its construction should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the interest deduction as revenue expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:41:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 72 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16620</link>
      <description>The High Court concluded that the new theatre was an expansion of the existing business, and the interest paid on borrowed funds for its construction should be treated as revenue expenditure. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the interest deduction as revenue expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>