<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 77 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside previous orders, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence in a case involving alleged clandestine production and clearance of goods without payment of duty. The appellant successfully argued for the importance of corroborative evidence and the legal principle of audi alteram partem, leading to the appeal being allowed with full consequential benefits according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:23:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 77 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside previous orders, emphasizing the need for concrete evidence in a case involving alleged clandestine production and clearance of goods without payment of duty. The appellant successfully argued for the importance of corroborative evidence and the legal principle of audi alteram partem, leading to the appeal being allowed with full consequential benefits according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>