<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374449</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the disallowance of CENVAT Credit on specific services, the interpretation of the definition of &quot;input services,&quot; and the application of judicial precedents to determine eligibility. The ruling set aside the demand on Travel Agency Services due to lack of proof of personal use by employees, aligning with legal principles, while upholding the demand on GTA (Outward) Services as the appellant did not contest it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 76 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374449</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the disallowance of CENVAT Credit on specific services, the interpretation of the definition of &quot;input services,&quot; and the application of judicial precedents to determine eligibility. The ruling set aside the demand on Travel Agency Services due to lack of proof of personal use by employees, aligning with legal principles, while upholding the demand on GTA (Outward) Services as the appellant did not contest it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>