<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 74 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374447</link>
    <description>The court allowed the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) applications regarding penalty and interest on CENVAT Credit utilization. The penalty was deleted as issues subject to litigation do not imply an intention to evade duty. However, interest was imposed on the portion of CENVAT Credit utilized by the appellant. The adjudicating authority was directed to calculate the interest on the utilized credit for the disputed years. Consequently, the ROM applications were partially allowed, modifying the previous order accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 74 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374447</link>
      <description>The court allowed the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) applications regarding penalty and interest on CENVAT Credit utilization. The penalty was deleted as issues subject to litigation do not imply an intention to evade duty. However, interest was imposed on the portion of CENVAT Credit utilized by the appellant. The adjudicating authority was directed to calculate the interest on the utilized credit for the disputed years. Consequently, the ROM applications were partially allowed, modifying the previous order accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>