<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 72 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374445</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for de novo consideration, requiring detailed information from the appellant on each type of clearance and processes amounting to deemed manufacture. The penalties imposed were set aside, and the demand of Rs. 90,85,559/- was deemed unjustified and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2019 09:23:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=556186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 72 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374445</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded for de novo consideration, requiring detailed information from the appellant on each type of clearance and processes amounting to deemed manufacture. The penalties imposed were set aside, and the demand of Rs. 90,85,559/- was deemed unjustified and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>