<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 41 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16617</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified that the term &quot;regular assessment&quot; in section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, refers to the initial assessment under section 143 or 144, not subsequent orders following appeals or revisions. This interpretation was supported by a Full Bench decision of the Bombay High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Calcutta High Court&#039;s decision was deemed incorrect. Consequently, the judgment ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Income-tax Officer&#039;s levy of interest on the shortfall in advance tax paid by the assessee. The reference was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:34:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 41 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16617</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified that the term &quot;regular assessment&quot; in section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, refers to the initial assessment under section 143 or 144, not subsequent orders following appeals or revisions. This interpretation was supported by a Full Bench decision of the Bombay High Court. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the Calcutta High Court&#039;s decision was deemed incorrect. Consequently, the judgment ruled in favor of the Revenue, upholding the Income-tax Officer&#039;s levy of interest on the shortfall in advance tax paid by the assessee. The reference was disposed of without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>