<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (4) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16613</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled against the assessee, holding that they were not entitled to claim development rebate at an enhanced rate of 25 percent for certain machineries installed in their factory. The court found that the assessee did not meet the criteria set out in the Income-tax Act for claiming the enhanced development rebate, based on previous judgments and the specific provisions of the Act. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency in applying the law to similar factual situations, ultimately favoring the Revenue in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (4) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16613</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled against the assessee, holding that they were not entitled to claim development rebate at an enhanced rate of 25 percent for certain machineries installed in their factory. The court found that the assessee did not meet the criteria set out in the Income-tax Act for claiming the enhanced development rebate, based on previous judgments and the specific provisions of the Act. The decision emphasized the importance of consistency in applying the law to similar factual situations, ultimately favoring the Revenue in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>