<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 57 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374430</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was found to have exceeded jurisdiction in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act after granting relief to the assessee. The doctrine of merger was emphasized, and legal precedents supported that the Revisional Authority cannot interfere with orders passed by the appellate Commissioner. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld that there was no violation of conditions under Section 10A(2)(ii) and (iii) in the case of the assessee&#039;s undertaking claiming exemption for the first time under Section 10A for the assessment year 2000-01. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, with the Substantial Questions of Law answered against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 57 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374430</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was found to have exceeded jurisdiction in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act after granting relief to the assessee. The doctrine of merger was emphasized, and legal precedents supported that the Revisional Authority cannot interfere with orders passed by the appellate Commissioner. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld that there was no violation of conditions under Section 10A(2)(ii) and (iii) in the case of the assessee&#039;s undertaking claiming exemption for the first time under Section 10A for the assessment year 2000-01. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, with the Substantial Questions of Law answered against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>