<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16595</link>
    <description>The court dismissed certain writ petitions upholding the validity of notices issued under Sections 14(2), 16(2), and 16(4) of the Wealth-tax Act. However, other writ petitions were allowed, leading to the quashing of assessment orders dated March 25, 1991, for specific years. These cases were remitted to the Wealth-tax Officer for reconsideration in line with the court&#039;s directions. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:43:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16595</link>
      <description>The court dismissed certain writ petitions upholding the validity of notices issued under Sections 14(2), 16(2), and 16(4) of the Wealth-tax Act. However, other writ petitions were allowed, leading to the quashing of assessment orders dated March 25, 1991, for specific years. These cases were remitted to the Wealth-tax Officer for reconsideration in line with the court&#039;s directions. No costs were awarded in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>