<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 28 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further verification and adjudication by the authorities. The judgment addressed issues including short levy of service tax, interpretation of legal provisions, valuation of taxable services, and validity of disallowing credit, emphasizing the need for detailed analysis and consideration of assessed values and limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:29:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 28 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the case for further verification and adjudication by the authorities. The judgment addressed issues including short levy of service tax, interpretation of legal provisions, valuation of taxable services, and validity of disallowing credit, emphasizing the need for detailed analysis and consideration of assessed values and limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>