<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 25 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374398</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellants, M/s. Pricol Ltd., in a case involving unauthorized transfer and distribution of CENVAT Credit. It held that the actions taken by the company were procedural corrections rather than substantive violations, resulting in a revenue-neutral outcome. The penalties imposed by the Original Authority were deemed unsustainable as no financial injury was caused to the exchequer. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 25 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374398</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellants, M/s. Pricol Ltd., in a case involving unauthorized transfer and distribution of CENVAT Credit. It held that the actions taken by the company were procedural corrections rather than substantive violations, resulting in a revenue-neutral outcome. The penalties imposed by the Original Authority were deemed unsustainable as no financial injury was caused to the exchequer. The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>