<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 24 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374397</link>
    <description>When inadmissible credit is reversed with interest before issuance of a show cause notice, section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 bars the notice on the tax demand and interest component. In the absence of any material showing suppression of facts or intent to evade tax, the record did not justify invoking penalty under Rule 15(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The demand proceedings and penal action were therefore treated as unsustainable, and relief followed for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 24 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374397</link>
      <description>When inadmissible credit is reversed with interest before issuance of a show cause notice, section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 bars the notice on the tax demand and interest component. In the absence of any material showing suppression of facts or intent to evade tax, the record did not justify invoking penalty under Rule 15(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The demand proceedings and penal action were therefore treated as unsustainable, and relief followed for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>