https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374397 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the order confirming demand, appropriation of credit, interest, and penalty. It held that the appellant complied with Section 73(3) of the Finance Act by paying the demand with interest before the Show Cause Notice issuance. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the appellant and deemed the penalty imposition unjustified due to the lack of findings by the Commissioner (A). The decision underscored the significance of accurate application of law and facts, resulting in the reversal of the initial order. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:28:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374397 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the order confirming demand, appropriation of credit, interest, and penalty. It held that the appellant complied with Section 73(3) of the Finance Act by paying the demand with interest before the Show Cause Notice issuance. The Tribunal found no suppression of facts by the appellant and deemed the penalty imposition unjustified due to the lack of findings by the Commissioner (A). The decision underscored the significance of accurate application of law and facts, resulting in the reversal of the initial order. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374397