<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 21 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374394</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalties imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. The appeal challenging the penalty imposition was dismissed as the adjudicating authority failed to establish suppression or misstatement against the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with audit observations and upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings that penalties under section 78 cannot be imposed for incorrect filing of returns. The order was pronounced on 25.01.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 21 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374394</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalties imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. The appeal challenging the penalty imposition was dismissed as the adjudicating authority failed to establish suppression or misstatement against the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with audit observations and upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings that penalties under section 78 cannot be imposed for incorrect filing of returns. The order was pronounced on 25.01.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>