<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 12 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374385</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of Rs. 1,20,52,945/- for Issue 3 concerning the incorrect reversal of CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods. Issues 4, 5, and 6 were remanded for reworking the credit. Penalties for all issues were set aside, as the appellant had sufficient credit balance, reversed credits during the investigation, and errors were due to legal interpretation or clerical mistakes. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:28:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 12 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374385</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of Rs. 1,20,52,945/- for Issue 3 concerning the incorrect reversal of CENVAT credit attributable to exempted goods. Issues 4, 5, and 6 were remanded for reworking the credit. Penalties for all issues were set aside, as the appellant had sufficient credit balance, reversed credits during the investigation, and errors were due to legal interpretation or clerical mistakes. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>