https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374375 The court declined to set aside the summoning order and quash the complaint against the petitioners in a case involving dishonor of a security deposit cheque under a lease agreement. Emphasizing the need for trial to address factual and legal complexities, the court held that the issues raised were not suitable for pre-trial intervention under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and cited the limited jurisdiction in such matters [Rajiv Thapar vs. Madan Lal Kapoor, (2013) 3 SCC 330]. The court also noted pending objections to an arbitration award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and upheld the presumption of liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Feb 2019 06:59:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374375 The court declined to set aside the summoning order and quash the complaint against the petitioners in a case involving dishonor of a security deposit cheque under a lease agreement. Emphasizing the need for trial to address factual and legal complexities, the court held that the issues raised were not suitable for pre-trial intervention under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and cited the limited jurisdiction in such matters [Rajiv Thapar vs. Madan Lal Kapoor, (2013) 3 SCC 330]. The court also noted pending objections to an arbitration award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and upheld the presumption of liability under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374375