<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1343 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278415</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the capital nature of compensation received, exclusion of certain taxes from total turnover under Section 80HHC, and the direct cost method for stock valuation. However, it reversed the CIT(A) on guest house rent and interest under Section 234B, aligning with Supreme Court rulings. The issue of advance excise duty under Section 43B was remanded for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 06:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1343 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278415</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the capital nature of compensation received, exclusion of certain taxes from total turnover under Section 80HHC, and the direct cost method for stock valuation. However, it reversed the CIT(A) on guest house rent and interest under Section 234B, aligning with Supreme Court rulings. The issue of advance excise duty under Section 43B was remanded for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>