<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1791 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance of depreciation by the Assessing Officer was incorrect. The appellant was granted the benefit of deduction under section 80IC on profits increased by the disallowances. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed that the excise refund should not be deducted from the cost of the asset, as it constitutes a revenue receipt forming part of profits and gains from the business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 06:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1791 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that the disallowance of depreciation by the Assessing Officer was incorrect. The appellant was granted the benefit of deduction under section 80IC on profits increased by the disallowances. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed that the excise refund should not be deducted from the cost of the asset, as it constitutes a revenue receipt forming part of profits and gains from the business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>