<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1534 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374369</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessment under Section 148 was valid after the Settlement Commission&#039;s order. The court held that Section 155(1)(C) did not apply as no regular assessment had been made, and Section 148 was appropriate in this case. The court found in favor of the Revenue, stating that the assessment was not barred by limitation and leaving the matter open for the First Appellate Authority to address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:23:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1534 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374369</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessment under Section 148 was valid after the Settlement Commission&#039;s order. The court held that Section 155(1)(C) did not apply as no regular assessment had been made, and Section 148 was appropriate in this case. The court found in favor of the Revenue, stating that the assessment was not barred by limitation and leaving the matter open for the First Appellate Authority to address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>