<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty was not justified based on the details provided during the penalty proceedings, citing the decision in CIT Vs. Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1530 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty was not justified based on the details provided during the penalty proceedings, citing the decision in CIT Vs. Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Ltd.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>