<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16578</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the taxpayer, holding that without the required notification under section 10(14)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the additional conveyance allowance and 40% of the incentive bonus cannot be exempted from taxation. The court agreed with the Department&#039;s argument that these allowances should be treated as part of the salary and are taxable accordingly. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow these deductions was deemed incorrect, and the court ruled in favor of the Department, denying the exemptions sought by the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:59:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 31 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16578</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the taxpayer, holding that without the required notification under section 10(14)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the additional conveyance allowance and 40% of the incentive bonus cannot be exempted from taxation. The court agreed with the Department&#039;s argument that these allowances should be treated as part of the salary and are taxable accordingly. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow these deductions was deemed incorrect, and the court ruled in favor of the Department, denying the exemptions sought by the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>