<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and directed the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the Transfer Pricing exercise was conducted diligently and in good faith, considering legal ambiguities at the time. It concluded that neither Explanation 1 nor Explanation 7 to section 271(1)(c) applied in this case, leading to the decision to overturn the penalty imposition. The order was pronounced on 28.01.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:12:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1524 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and directed the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the Transfer Pricing exercise was conducted diligently and in good faith, considering legal ambiguities at the time. It concluded that neither Explanation 1 nor Explanation 7 to section 271(1)(c) applied in this case, leading to the decision to overturn the penalty imposition. The order was pronounced on 28.01.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>