<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Consistent Discount-to-Sales Ratio: Ad-Hoc Disallowance Legally Unjustifiable Despite Verification Challenges.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44221</link>
    <description>When the percentage of discounts to sales is consistent over the years then the ad-hoc disallowance is bad in law. Just because there are certain difficulty in verification of bills, the discounts cannot be restricted to the absolute figure of what amount was allowed in the immediately previous year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:01:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:01:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Consistent Discount-to-Sales Ratio: Ad-Hoc Disallowance Legally Unjustifiable Despite Verification Challenges.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44221</link>
      <description>When the percentage of discounts to sales is consistent over the years then the ad-hoc disallowance is bad in law. Just because there are certain difficulty in verification of bills, the discounts cannot be restricted to the absolute figure of what amount was allowed in the immediately previous year.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:01:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>