<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374344</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the summoning order by the criminal court, considering the impact of the appellate tribunal&#039;s orders on the compliance period and the legality of the criminal proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of appellate decisions in modifying statutory timelines and the need for adherence to legal provisions regarding deposit repayment under the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1509 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374344</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the summoning order by the criminal court, considering the impact of the appellate tribunal&#039;s orders on the compliance period and the legality of the criminal proceedings. The judgment emphasized the importance of appellate decisions in modifying statutory timelines and the need for adherence to legal provisions regarding deposit repayment under the Companies Act, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>