<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1499 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374334</link>
    <description>The court rejected the accused-applicant&#039;s second bail application in a bribery conspiracy case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Despite claims of changed circumstances and parity with co-accused, the court found the accused-applicant&#039;s role grave and distinguishable, with evidence of accepting bribe money. The recovery of bribe money from the accused-applicant&#039;s possession without explanation undermined grounds for bail. Emphasizing the gravity of the offense, the court directed an expedited trial, allowing a reapplication for bail if trial completion exceeds a year. The decision highlighted the accused-applicant&#039;s direct involvement in the conspiracy and the need for swift justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1499 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374334</link>
      <description>The court rejected the accused-applicant&#039;s second bail application in a bribery conspiracy case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Despite claims of changed circumstances and parity with co-accused, the court found the accused-applicant&#039;s role grave and distinguishable, with evidence of accepting bribe money. The recovery of bribe money from the accused-applicant&#039;s possession without explanation undermined grounds for bail. Emphasizing the gravity of the offense, the court directed an expedited trial, allowing a reapplication for bail if trial completion exceeds a year. The decision highlighted the accused-applicant&#039;s direct involvement in the conspiracy and the need for swift justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>