<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheque Dishonor Case: Accused from Hindustan Traders Acquitted Due to Complainant&#039;s Inadequate Explanation of Insufficient Funds.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44212</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - There was no reason for the applicant/accused to issue a cheque of his personal liability in the capacity as a Proprietor of Hindustan Traders. The complainant has not bothered to explain the same. Thus, the applicant/accused is entitled for the benefit of doubt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:53:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:53:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheque Dishonor Case: Accused from Hindustan Traders Acquitted Due to Complainant&#039;s Inadequate Explanation of Insufficient Funds.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44212</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - There was no reason for the applicant/accused to issue a cheque of his personal liability in the capacity as a Proprietor of Hindustan Traders. The complainant has not bothered to explain the same. Thus, the applicant/accused is entitled for the benefit of doubt.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:53:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=44212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>