<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1400 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the validity of the notice under section 153C, the addition of unexplained investment under section 69C, and the confirmation of penalties under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s orders to be well-reasoned and justified, concluding that the appellant&#039;s contentions lacked merit and factual basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1400 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the validity of the notice under section 153C, the addition of unexplained investment under section 69C, and the confirmation of penalties under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s orders to be well-reasoned and justified, concluding that the appellant&#039;s contentions lacked merit and factual basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>