<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1488 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278402</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of 12 comparables due to functional dissimilarity and the inclusion of excess provision written back as part of operating profit. The decision stressed the significance of functional comparability and consistent accounting practices in transfer pricing evaluations, aligning with previous rulings and ensuring a more accurate financial analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1488 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278402</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the exclusion of 12 comparables due to functional dissimilarity and the inclusion of excess provision written back as part of operating profit. The decision stressed the significance of functional comparability and consistent accounting practices in transfer pricing evaluations, aligning with previous rulings and ensuring a more accurate financial analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>