https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278404 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed receipts made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order, considering the detailed reconciliation provided by the assessee to explain the discrepancy in receipts. The Tribunal noted the difference in treatment of service tax and concluded that the CIT(A) had properly analyzed the discrepancies and reasons for the differences in declared receipts. As the Revenue failed to present any material to contradict the findings, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:36:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278404 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of undisclosed receipts made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order, considering the detailed reconciliation provided by the assessee to explain the discrepancy in receipts. The Tribunal noted the difference in treatment of service tax and concluded that the CIT(A) had properly analyzed the discrepancies and reasons for the differences in declared receipts. As the Revenue failed to present any material to contradict the findings, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 25 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278404