<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1475 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374310</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the businessman&#039;s prerogative in determining commercial expediency in advancing funds to sister concerns. The Court reiterated that Income Tax Authorities should not interfere in such commercial decisions unless borrowed funds are not used for business purposes by the sister concerns. The appeal challenging the disallowance of interest paid on borrowed funds was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:20:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1475 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374310</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the businessman&#039;s prerogative in determining commercial expediency in advancing funds to sister concerns. The Court reiterated that Income Tax Authorities should not interfere in such commercial decisions unless borrowed funds are not used for business purposes by the sister concerns. The appeal challenging the disallowance of interest paid on borrowed funds was dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>