https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374291 The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal against the order of CIT(A) for AY 2010-11. Various grounds including addition of discounts, alleged bogus purchases, transportation charges, staff welfare expenses, and accounting charges were considered. The Tribunal upheld some disallowances due to lack of evidence but set aside certain matters for fresh adjudication. The overall outcome favored the assessee on several grounds, resulting in a partial success of the appeal. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:19:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374291 The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal against the order of CIT(A) for AY 2010-11. Various grounds including addition of discounts, alleged bogus purchases, transportation charges, staff welfare expenses, and accounting charges were considered. The Tribunal upheld some disallowances due to lack of evidence but set aside certain matters for fresh adjudication. The overall outcome favored the assessee on several grounds, resulting in a partial success of the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374291