https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374283 The Tribunal set aside the order revoking the CHA license and forfeiting the security deposit of the appellant, directing the restoration of the license within three weeks. The Tribunal found that the charges against the appellant were not sustainable as the Department failed to provide specific evidence of wrongdoing, and the allegations were deemed vague. The appellant's argument regarding the lack of specific evidence and procedural irregularities was considered, leading to the decision in their favor. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374283 The Tribunal set aside the order revoking the CHA license and forfeiting the security deposit of the appellant, directing the restoration of the license within three weeks. The Tribunal found that the charges against the appellant were not sustainable as the Department failed to provide specific evidence of wrongdoing, and the allegations were deemed vague. The appellant's argument regarding the lack of specific evidence and procedural irregularities was considered, leading to the decision in their favor. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374283