<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1444 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374279</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasized compliance with regulatory parameters and policy changes regarding the export of non-Basmati rice, concluding that the exported rice exceeded the parameters set by the DGFT. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the facts, legal provisions, and precedents cited during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1444 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374279</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasized compliance with regulatory parameters and policy changes regarding the export of non-Basmati rice, concluding that the exported rice exceeded the parameters set by the DGFT. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of the facts, legal provisions, and precedents cited during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>