<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1439 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374274</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the service tax demand for the sale of insurance products was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s argument of double taxation was rejected, citing previous decisions supporting the tax liability. The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax based on precedents and interpretations, dropping the penalty due to the issue involving interpretation. The appeal was disposed of in favor of confirming the service tax liability but dropping the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 08:05:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1439 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374274</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the service tax demand for the sale of insurance products was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s argument of double taxation was rejected, citing previous decisions supporting the tax liability. The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax based on precedents and interpretations, dropping the penalty due to the issue involving interpretation. The appeal was disposed of in favor of confirming the service tax liability but dropping the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>