<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1437 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to deficiencies in invoking the appropriate sections of the Finance Act, 1994 post the tax regime alteration. Emphasizing the importance of due process and consistency in tax proceedings under the amended law, the judgment highlighted errors in the Commissioner&#039;s actions and invalidated the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1437 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order due to deficiencies in invoking the appropriate sections of the Finance Act, 1994 post the tax regime alteration. Emphasizing the importance of due process and consistency in tax proceedings under the amended law, the judgment highlighted errors in the Commissioner&#039;s actions and invalidated the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>