<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit beyond the approved amount as there was no further appeal against the previous order. The denial of credit related to 122 invoices was confirmed due to the appellant&#039;s failure to furnish the invoices as directed. However, the penalty for non-submission of invoices was set aside as there was no evidence of fraud or suppression of facts. Ultimately, the appeal was partly allowed, overturning the demand for penalties while upholding the denial of credit for the 122 invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1423 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit beyond the approved amount as there was no further appeal against the previous order. The denial of credit related to 122 invoices was confirmed due to the appellant&#039;s failure to furnish the invoices as directed. However, the penalty for non-submission of invoices was set aside as there was no evidence of fraud or suppression of facts. Ultimately, the appeal was partly allowed, overturning the demand for penalties while upholding the denial of credit for the 122 invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>