https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374256 The Tribunal considered the appeal in favor of the appellant despite non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as 10% of the disputed amount was already deposited. The matter was remanded for decision on merits. The Tribunal criticized the appellant's casual approach and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 for filing the appeal carelessly. The appeal was directed to proceed on merits after the cost payment, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements and procedural diligence in seeking appellate remedies. en-us Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Jan 2019 07:00:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374256 The Tribunal considered the appeal in favor of the appellant despite non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as 10% of the disputed amount was already deposited. The matter was remanded for decision on merits. The Tribunal criticized the appellant's casual approach and imposed a cost of Rs. 5,000 for filing the appeal carelessly. The appeal was directed to proceed on merits after the cost payment, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements and procedural diligence in seeking appellate remedies. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374256