<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1405 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271AAA for the assessment year 2009-10, except for certain items of income that did not qualify as &#039;undisclosed income.&#039; The assessee&#039;s arguments for immunity under section 271AAA(2) and lack of proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer were rejected. The Tribunal also restricted the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s power to enhance the penalty to items considered by the Assessing Officer under section 271AAA. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1405 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271AAA for the assessment year 2009-10, except for certain items of income that did not qualify as &#039;undisclosed income.&#039; The assessee&#039;s arguments for immunity under section 271AAA(2) and lack of proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer were rejected. The Tribunal also restricted the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s power to enhance the penalty to items considered by the Assessing Officer under section 271AAA. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>