<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1398 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting the issue to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration due to procedural irregularities in considering fresh evidence without providing an opportunity to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to procedural rules and proper verification of evidence in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1398 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, remitting the issue to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration due to procedural irregularities in considering fresh evidence without providing an opportunity to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to procedural rules and proper verification of evidence in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>