<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1392 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on undisclosed income of Rs. 75,00,000/- under section 271AAB(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It dismissed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections, ruling that the penalty was validly imposed and not exempt under the principle of &quot;buying peace.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized adherence to binding judicial precedents and correct statutory interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1392 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on undisclosed income of Rs. 75,00,000/- under section 271AAB(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It dismissed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections, ruling that the penalty was validly imposed and not exempt under the principle of &quot;buying peace.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized adherence to binding judicial precedents and correct statutory interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>