https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374223 Maintainability of the safeguard duty application under Rule 5 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997 and Section 8B(6)(b) was challenged on the ground that the claimed domestic industry had not shown the requisite share of total Indian production. The petitioner also disputed the computation of collective production and the factual basis for the safeguard duty notification. At the interim stage, the Court granted ad-interim protection by permitting release of goods without immediate payment of safeguard duty on execution of a bond, while preserving the respondent's right to recover duty if the notification was ultimately upheld. en-us Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:24:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374223 Maintainability of the safeguard duty application under Rule 5 of the Customs Tariff (Identification and Assessment of Safeguard Duty) Rules, 1997 and Section 8B(6)(b) was challenged on the ground that the claimed domestic industry had not shown the requisite share of total Indian production. The petitioner also disputed the computation of collective production and the factual basis for the safeguard duty notification. At the interim stage, the Court granted ad-interim protection by permitting release of goods without immediate payment of safeguard duty on execution of a bond, while preserving the respondent's right to recover duty if the notification was ultimately upheld. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374223