<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for the balance duty amount of Rs. 6,04,090/- along with applicable interest from 19.12.2011. The penalty under Section 11AC(c) was set aside due to the appellant&#039;s erroneous legal interpretation and lack of mala fide intent. The appeal was partially allowed with specified modifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for the balance duty amount of Rs. 6,04,090/- along with applicable interest from 19.12.2011. The penalty under Section 11AC(c) was set aside due to the appellant&#039;s erroneous legal interpretation and lack of mala fide intent. The appeal was partially allowed with specified modifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>