<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1374 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374209</link>
    <description>The court held that the awards were enforceable in India, rejecting the respondents&#039; objections as impermissible attempts to seek a review on merits. The tribunal&#039;s findings did not contravene Indian law&#039;s fundamental policy or deny the respondents a fair opportunity to present their case. Consequently, the petitioner was granted the right to proceed with execution, and the awards were deemed enforceable against the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:23:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1374 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374209</link>
      <description>The court held that the awards were enforceable in India, rejecting the respondents&#039; objections as impermissible attempts to seek a review on merits. The tribunal&#039;s findings did not contravene Indian law&#039;s fundamental policy or deny the respondents a fair opportunity to present their case. Consequently, the petitioner was granted the right to proceed with execution, and the awards were deemed enforceable against the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>