<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1638 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked the authority to levy fees under Section 234E while processing TDS statements before 01.06.2015. Consequently, the demand for fees under Section 234E was deemed invalid and was set aside, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on 29/10/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:11:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1638 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked the authority to levy fees under Section 234E while processing TDS statements before 01.06.2015. Consequently, the demand for fees under Section 234E was deemed invalid and was set aside, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on 29/10/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>