<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 810 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278355</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the respondent&#039;s application for appointment on compassionate grounds due to their family income exceeding the specified limit of 3 lakhs for a Group &#039;C&#039; post. The court emphasized that compassionate appointments are exceptions to provide for sudden financial crises in deceased employees&#039; families and must adhere to scheme parameters based on family income. The court referenced legal precedents to highlight the importance of considering the financial condition of the deceased employee&#039;s family in such appointments. The appeal was allowed, and the previous judgments were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 14:15:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 810 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278355</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the respondent&#039;s application for appointment on compassionate grounds due to their family income exceeding the specified limit of 3 lakhs for a Group &#039;C&#039; post. The court emphasized that compassionate appointments are exceptions to provide for sudden financial crises in deceased employees&#039; families and must adhere to scheme parameters based on family income. The court referenced legal precedents to highlight the importance of considering the financial condition of the deceased employee&#039;s family in such appointments. The appeal was allowed, and the previous judgments were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>