<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1368 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374203</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit a total of Rs. 90 crores with the Central Consumer Welfare Fund in two instalments, while also allowing for the filing of counter-affidavits and rejoinders within specified timelines. Penalty proceedings were to be kept in abeyance, with investigations continuing. The judgment outlined the need for responses from the respondents on various disputed amounts, emphasizing the actions required to prevent coercive measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1368 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374203</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit a total of Rs. 90 crores with the Central Consumer Welfare Fund in two instalments, while also allowing for the filing of counter-affidavits and rejoinders within specified timelines. Penalty proceedings were to be kept in abeyance, with investigations continuing. The judgment outlined the need for responses from the respondents on various disputed amounts, emphasizing the actions required to prevent coercive measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>