<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 67 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16525</link>
    <description>The court held that the sum received from the approved superannuation fund on premature retirement was not taxable as income. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the exclusion of such receipts from the definition of &quot;income&quot; under the Income-tax Act. The court highlighted the strict interpretation of fiscal statutes and ruled against the Revenue. The case was concluded with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:07:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 67 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16525</link>
      <description>The court held that the sum received from the approved superannuation fund on premature retirement was not taxable as income. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the exclusion of such receipts from the definition of &quot;income&quot; under the Income-tax Act. The court highlighted the strict interpretation of fiscal statutes and ruled against the Revenue. The case was concluded with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>