<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 35 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16524</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notices issued by the Tax Recovery Officer demanding arrears of income tax from a defunct firm, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument that he was not a partner. The court relied on the Settlement Commission&#039;s findings and the petitioner&#039;s involvement in settlement proceedings to establish his liability for the arrears. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims, the court concluded that the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to cancel the firm&#039;s registration and treat it as unregistered confirmed the petitioner&#039;s responsibility to clear the arrears, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 35 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16524</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notices issued by the Tax Recovery Officer demanding arrears of income tax from a defunct firm, rejecting the petitioner&#039;s argument that he was not a partner. The court relied on the Settlement Commission&#039;s findings and the petitioner&#039;s involvement in settlement proceedings to establish his liability for the arrears. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims, the court concluded that the Settlement Commission&#039;s decision to cancel the firm&#039;s registration and treat it as unregistered confirmed the petitioner&#039;s responsibility to clear the arrears, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>