https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278352 Limitation for execution under Section 48 CPC was held to attract exclusion under the Limitation Act where execution had been stayed or injuncted, because the restraint period was shown from the record and the limitation period fixed for execution was treated as a period of limitation for Section 15 purposes. The same approach was applied to earlier execution proceedings that had become infructuous, with no separate challenge to good faith or bona fides defeating exclusion under Section 14. On that basis, the decree-holder's execution was not time-barred, and the appeal failed. en-us Mon, 21 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:18:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278352 Limitation for execution under Section 48 CPC was held to attract exclusion under the Limitation Act where execution had been stayed or injuncted, because the restraint period was shown from the record and the limitation period fixed for execution was treated as a period of limitation for Section 15 purposes. The same approach was applied to earlier execution proceedings that had become infructuous, with no separate challenge to good faith or bona fides defeating exclusion under Section 14. On that basis, the decree-holder's execution was not time-barred, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Mar 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278352