https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278351 Payment proved by the documentary record, including the family day-book, bank passbook and accompanying letter, was treated as having been made towards the suit promissory note, so the debt was credited accordingly. On limitation, exclusion of time under Section 13 of the Limitation Act 1908 was treated as extending the period for making an acknowledgment under Section 19, unlike the position under Section 4, which does not enlarge the acknowledgment period. An acknowledgment made within the time so computed was therefore effective, and the suit was held to be within limitation. en-us Mon, 12 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:15:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278351 Payment proved by the documentary record, including the family day-book, bank passbook and accompanying letter, was treated as having been made towards the suit promissory note, so the debt was credited accordingly. On limitation, exclusion of time under Section 13 of the Limitation Act 1908 was treated as extending the period for making an acknowledgment under Section 19, unlike the position under Section 4, which does not enlarge the acknowledgment period. An acknowledgment made within the time so computed was therefore effective, and the suit was held to be within limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278351